While researching potty training, and the elimination of disposable diapers from a kid's life, the author has come across several recent trends. The most disturbing trend is that children have gone from being potty-trained at around 18 months on average in the 1960s, to taking, on average, 30 months today. It seems that this is expanding. years ago, Pampers introduced Size 7 diapers to the marketplace (something that no other manufacturer has followed), but a recent review of the Pampers.com web-site found that Pampers is now calling some of their largest diapers (disposable training pants and disposable underclothing) "Size 8". Another alarming recent news story, purportedly from the U.K. discussed how children were remaining in diapers until school age. It went on to say, school teachers were changing children in Kindergarten. This news story blamed time constraints on the relatives, and that lots of day care workers were putting children in to diapers while at their day care middle for "convenience" reasons, which effectively undermined any of the potty-training efforts the parents had done. I query the validity of this news story ( about children going to simple school without being potty-trained), so there is no mention of a link to it, but its ramifications, as I prepare to bring triplets in to this world, are profound. Even if this news story is not true, some of the issues, day cares undermining the consistency efforts of parents with potty training are probably issues that lots of parents of children in today's busy world will face.
The average child in the United States makes use of three,500 diapers per year (roughly 9 diaper changes per day). This is an average, and because of normal diaper changes, sizes, etc. the average child makes use of lots of more diapers their first year, then their second and so forth. However, if a kid stays in diapers for additional year, that is at least an additional $1168 per kid (based on the average prices of size five, 6 and 7 diapers at $0.40 / diaper). As the future parent of triplets, this means that my costs, per year, escalate to well over $3000. Therefore, the economic incentives alone are well worth investing time and thoughts on the subject, although my relatives is unborn.
There are lots of factors that point to why our children are remaining in diapers longer. Some blame parents for lack of consistency and time. Others say day cares and other help they must reach out for to make ends meet undermine our potty-training efforts by putting children back in diapers for their own convenience. Others blame physicians who recommend letting the kid "choose" when to ditch diapers.
The culprit probably lies somewhere within and as a combination of most of these suggestions. However, of the most obvious factors that others are not discussing is that of children using disposable training pants that look, feel and protect like a diaper. An example, as a kid, the author's father was eight years more youthful than he was, and he still remembers his father going through potty training. At the time, training pants were entirely cloth, and resembled thick underclothing, and accidents were obvious, messy for everyone and created clear discomfort for the kid. After several accidents, the author's father was potty-trained quickly, but the cleanup and the additional work surrounding using underclothing as training pants put a strain on the father, and the potty-training system started and stopped repeatedly for several months. Soon after the author's father was potty-trained, Huggies introduced Pull-Ups.
Pull-Ups provided a great advantage for the parent, & for the infant. They still looked, felt-like & resembled underclothing, but they contained accidents much better, leading to less time. This was also when diapers were usually a solid color, were plastic-backed, had tapes on them (in lieu of Velcro). Pull-ups on the other hand felt like cloth, had cartoon characters on them, & the infant pulled them up, in lieu of the parent putting the infant in them. Soon after though, diapers changed & they started making them with a cloth-like cover, Velcro tapes, & featured cartoonish designs. The issue with this, in the author's opinion, is that these improvements in the diaper removed the advantage for the infant - that of wearing "big boy" pants. The only actual difference between diapers & disposable training pants (as far as the author can tell) is that the infant pulls them up, although they look, feel & protect like a diaper. Another issue with this was the release of "convertible style" diapers which are no longer available on the market. These diapers were pulled up (supposedly by the parent), & this left small distinction, if any, between the supposedly special training pant, & the diaper. The diaper companies soon stopped making these diapers, but for them to put this type of diaper in to the marketplace, knowing that they are identical to pull-ups in every aspect looks as if flawed logic. Are they deliberately trying to keep our children in diapers longer? Probably, its lovely business, they sell more products, but fully fleshing this argument removes the blameworthiness from the parent, & puts it on an intangible corporation, something that ought to not be encouraged. Even in the event that they are doing this deliberately, it is up to the parent to take matters in to their own hands. If these products did not sell, the company would cease making them, if they keep purchasing them, then they have every incentive to keep producing it.
The point with this diatribe is fundamentally that in the event you are going to try and get your kid to make use of the potty, introducing pants to wear in lieu of diapers, that look, feel and do the same job as diapers are diapers to the kid and the kid sees no difference. In the event you are motivating your kid to get out of diapers, why then would you put them in something that is identical?
The convenience of disposable underclothes is a immense bonus, but the issue still exists for the kid they are still wearing diapers, although they are being told they are not. Regrettably, this might be a immense contributing factor to why kids have such difficulties with potty training now. Couple this with the frantic schedule everyone leads, which diminishes the time available to be consistent with a kid, and it is simple to see why it might take longer to potty train a child.
As for the author's babies, well, unless something changes, they will try to put them in cloth, traditional training pants. There will be messes, but putting them back in diapers, irrespective of how lots of times they tell them they are not "diapers" does not appear like it will accomplish the desired results. A key issue with this exists though, & if day care workers are undermining potty training efforts with pull-ups, then how will they act when a child has an accident in underclothing? At least they would have a chance with a pull-up though. Regrettably, I do not have the answers at this point, but I do know what I will try to do in the future. They have years before they jump off this bridge, but with triplets, my personal aim is to eliminate diapers, & the large expense that goes along with this as soon as feasible. Possibly they will take a week off from work & try of those potty-training boot camps, but from what I do know, potty-training is a long, difficult technique, where consistency is the paramount key. Switching from diapers, & maintaining a diaper-free existence for the child ought to accomplish success,,, I hope.
Related Post:
The average child in the United States makes use of three,500 diapers per year (roughly 9 diaper changes per day). This is an average, and because of normal diaper changes, sizes, etc. the average child makes use of lots of more diapers their first year, then their second and so forth. However, if a kid stays in diapers for additional year, that is at least an additional $1168 per kid (based on the average prices of size five, 6 and 7 diapers at $0.40 / diaper). As the future parent of triplets, this means that my costs, per year, escalate to well over $3000. Therefore, the economic incentives alone are well worth investing time and thoughts on the subject, although my relatives is unborn.
There are lots of factors that point to why our children are remaining in diapers longer. Some blame parents for lack of consistency and time. Others say day cares and other help they must reach out for to make ends meet undermine our potty-training efforts by putting children back in diapers for their own convenience. Others blame physicians who recommend letting the kid "choose" when to ditch diapers.
The culprit probably lies somewhere within and as a combination of most of these suggestions. However, of the most obvious factors that others are not discussing is that of children using disposable training pants that look, feel and protect like a diaper. An example, as a kid, the author's father was eight years more youthful than he was, and he still remembers his father going through potty training. At the time, training pants were entirely cloth, and resembled thick underclothing, and accidents were obvious, messy for everyone and created clear discomfort for the kid. After several accidents, the author's father was potty-trained quickly, but the cleanup and the additional work surrounding using underclothing as training pants put a strain on the father, and the potty-training system started and stopped repeatedly for several months. Soon after the author's father was potty-trained, Huggies introduced Pull-Ups.
Pull-Ups provided a great advantage for the parent, & for the infant. They still looked, felt-like & resembled underclothing, but they contained accidents much better, leading to less time. This was also when diapers were usually a solid color, were plastic-backed, had tapes on them (in lieu of Velcro). Pull-ups on the other hand felt like cloth, had cartoon characters on them, & the infant pulled them up, in lieu of the parent putting the infant in them. Soon after though, diapers changed & they started making them with a cloth-like cover, Velcro tapes, & featured cartoonish designs. The issue with this, in the author's opinion, is that these improvements in the diaper removed the advantage for the infant - that of wearing "big boy" pants. The only actual difference between diapers & disposable training pants (as far as the author can tell) is that the infant pulls them up, although they look, feel & protect like a diaper. Another issue with this was the release of "convertible style" diapers which are no longer available on the market. These diapers were pulled up (supposedly by the parent), & this left small distinction, if any, between the supposedly special training pant, & the diaper. The diaper companies soon stopped making these diapers, but for them to put this type of diaper in to the marketplace, knowing that they are identical to pull-ups in every aspect looks as if flawed logic. Are they deliberately trying to keep our children in diapers longer? Probably, its lovely business, they sell more products, but fully fleshing this argument removes the blameworthiness from the parent, & puts it on an intangible corporation, something that ought to not be encouraged. Even in the event that they are doing this deliberately, it is up to the parent to take matters in to their own hands. If these products did not sell, the company would cease making them, if they keep purchasing them, then they have every incentive to keep producing it.
The point with this diatribe is fundamentally that in the event you are going to try and get your kid to make use of the potty, introducing pants to wear in lieu of diapers, that look, feel and do the same job as diapers are diapers to the kid and the kid sees no difference. In the event you are motivating your kid to get out of diapers, why then would you put them in something that is identical?
The convenience of disposable underclothes is a immense bonus, but the issue still exists for the kid they are still wearing diapers, although they are being told they are not. Regrettably, this might be a immense contributing factor to why kids have such difficulties with potty training now. Couple this with the frantic schedule everyone leads, which diminishes the time available to be consistent with a kid, and it is simple to see why it might take longer to potty train a child.
As for the author's babies, well, unless something changes, they will try to put them in cloth, traditional training pants. There will be messes, but putting them back in diapers, irrespective of how lots of times they tell them they are not "diapers" does not appear like it will accomplish the desired results. A key issue with this exists though, & if day care workers are undermining potty training efforts with pull-ups, then how will they act when a child has an accident in underclothing? At least they would have a chance with a pull-up though. Regrettably, I do not have the answers at this point, but I do know what I will try to do in the future. They have years before they jump off this bridge, but with triplets, my personal aim is to eliminate diapers, & the large expense that goes along with this as soon as feasible. Possibly they will take a week off from work & try of those potty-training boot camps, but from what I do know, potty-training is a long, difficult technique, where consistency is the paramount key. Switching from diapers, & maintaining a diaper-free existence for the child ought to accomplish success,,, I hope.
Read the information and more on potty training tricks book:
Related Post:
Ditching Diapers - Potty Training Problems, Trends and Suggestions